关于数据库:GreatSQL一个关于主从复制的限制描述与规避

36次阅读

共计 8967 个字符，预计需要花费 23 分钟才能阅读完成。

一、背景

分享一个在我的项目运维中遇到的一个主从复制限度的一个坑，我的项目的架构为主集群 + 灾备集群，每个集群为一主两从模式。主集群到灾备集群的同步为主从复制的形式，依据业务需要灾备集群须要疏忽零碎库跟某些配置表，所以才会触发此限度，而这个限度如果咱们之前没有遇到过，那么排查起来也是绝对不易的。

二、限度形容

1、主从同步呈现报错

greatsql> show slave status\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
               Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
                  Master_Host: 192.168.xxx.xxx
                  Master_User: repl
                  Master_Port: 3306
                Connect_Retry: 60
              Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000990
          Read_Master_Log_Pos: 92274290
               Relay_Log_File: greatsql-relay.002963     -----
                Relay_Log_Pos: 701548899
        Relay_Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000988
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: No
              Replicate_Do_DB:
          Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
           Replicate_Do_Table:
       Replicate_Ignore_Table:
      Replicate_Wild_Do_Table:
  Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc
                   Last_Errno: 1146
                   Last_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
                 Skip_Counter: 0
          Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 701548690
              Relay_Log_Space: 2246320360
              Until_Condition: None
               Until_Log_File:
                Until_Log_Pos: 0
           Master_SSL_Allowed: No
           Master_SSL_CA_File:
           Master_SSL_CA_Path:
              Master_SSL_Cert:
            Master_SSL_Cipher:
               Master_SSL_Key:
        Seconds_Behind_Master: NULL
Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert: No
                Last_IO_Errno: 0
                Last_IO_Error:
               Last_SQL_Errno: 1146
               Last_SQL_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
  Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
             Master_Server_Id: 1943306
                  Master_UUID: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb
             Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
                    SQL_Delay: 0
          SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
      Slave_SQL_Running_State:
           Master_Retry_Count: 86400
                  Master_Bind:
      Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
     Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp: 230822 14:14:18
               Master_SSL_Crl:
           Master_SSL_Crlpath:
           Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:2-47565802
            Executed_Gtid_Set: 30873cfe-8750-11ed-b56f-744aa4073024:1-270,
9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:1-47508256
                Auto_Position: 1
         Replicate_Rewrite_DB:  
                 Channel_Name:
           Master_TLS_Version:
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

依据 slave status 状态信息能够看出

  • 报错的 GTID 为：'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'
  • 利用的主集群的 binlog 为：greatsql-bin.000988
  • 灾备集群的 relay log 为：greatsql-relay.002963

详细信息查看 performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker 表

2、查看谬误的详细信息

greatsql> select * from performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
         CHANNEL_NAME:
            WORKER_ID: 1
            THREAD_ID: NULL
        SERVICE_STATE: OFF
LAST_SEEN_TRANSACTION: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257
    LAST_ERROR_NUMBER: 1146
   LAST_ERROR_MESSAGE: Worker 1 failed executing transaction
'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988,
end_log_pos 701570116; Error executing row event: 'Table'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info'doesn't exist'
LAST_ERROR_TIMESTAMP: 2023-08-22 14:14:18

上述信息阐明依据 performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker 表中的具体错误信息能够发现为灾备集群 abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info 表不存在，导致同步报错

3、问题剖析

3.1、确认灾备集群中指标表是否存在

greatsql> show create table abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist
greatsql> desc abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist

论断：灾备集群中指标表确实不存在

3.2、依据主从报错信息解析主集群 binlog，报错的 SQL

解析主集群 binlog

SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'/*!*/;
……
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570000         Table_map: `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` mapped to number 1595
# at 701570000
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570116         Write_rows: table id 1595 flags: STMT_END_F
### INSERT INTO `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info`
### SET
###   @1=2
###   @2='自动化'
###   @3='2300121212120000'
###   @4='90000000'
###   @5='1'
###   @6='202001290231001'
###   @7='2021-01-31 00:00:00'
# at 701570116
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570143         Xid = 800998400
COMMIT/*!*/;
# at 701570143
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570204         GTID        last_committed=26491        sequence_number=26521        rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/;

论断：依据复制的报错信息得悉具体的 GTID 号以及主集群的 binlog 文件，解析 binlog 得悉此事务为一条 INSERT 语句，语句中的指标表与 performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker 表中信息统一

3.3、寻找主集群指标表 binlog 中是否有建表语句

在同一 binlog 日志中寻找建表语句

SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS `abs_xxx` /*!40100 DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin */
/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864451

论断：在主集群的 binlog 日志中找到了指标表的建表语句，阐明主集群执行 DDL 时并没有敞开 binlog 日志，那么持续查看在灾备集群的中继日志中是否存在 DDL 语句

3.4、解析灾备集群的中继日志，确认是否拉取到灾备集群

#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 475863662         GTID        last_committed=16341        sequence_number=16342        rbr_only=no
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47498079'/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864660
#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 475864512         GTID        last_committed=16342        sequence_number=16343        rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/;

论断：灾备集群的中继日志中存在 DDL 建表语句，阐明并不是 IO 线程出了问题

3.5、排查复制配置的疏忽库表

Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc

论断：疏忽库表中并不蕴含指标表，然而依据以上解析日志发现，在主集群 binlog 日志中建表语句之前有个 use information_schema/!/; 的语句，此库为同步疏忽的零碎库，因而触发了 GreatSQL 的标准限度，在疏忽库下对未疏忽进行操作 Statement 模式下记录语句默认不起作用（详情：https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/replication-options-r…）

4、解决同步报错

在灾备集群创立指标表

greatsql> CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (`ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC;

greatsql> stop slave;
greatsql> start slave;

论断：在灾备集群创立指标表后重启复制复原胜利

三、限度躲避

1、第一种躲避形式

执行 DDL 时进入指标库

greatsql> use abs_cust
greatsql> DDL 语句（CREATE\DROP\ALTER）

阐明：在利用连贯数据库时有可能默认就是 information_schema 库，而此环境将零碎库全副疏忽，所以为了躲避相似的问题，请在执行 SQL 语句时请先 use 到指标表的指标库。

2、第二种躲避形式

批改主从复制配置，以下步骤为测试环境

敞开灾备集群在复制同步

greatsql> stop slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.03 sec)

批改疏忽库

greatsql> change replication filter Replicate_Ignore_DB=();

批改疏忽表

greatsql> change replication filter replicate_wild_ignore_table =('mysql.%','information_schema.%','sys.%','performance_schema.%');

启动同步

greatsql> start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.37 sec)

测试验证

主集群：

greatsql> use mysql
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed

greatsql> create table test111.test111(id int primary key);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)

greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111           |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

灾备集群：

greatsql> use test111
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed

greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111           |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

阐明：复制配置中参数 Replicate_Ignore_DB 设置为空，将 replicate_wild_ignore_table 参数设置为 shema_name.% 的形式也能够躲避相似的问题

四、特地阐明

  • 在 MySQL 5.7 跟 8.0 版本也存在此限度

Enjoy GreatSQL :)

## 对于 GreatSQL

GreatSQL 是实用于金融级利用的国内自主开源数据库，具备高性能、高牢靠、高易用性、高平安等多个外围个性，能够作为 MySQL 或 Percona Server 的可选替换，用于线上生产环境，且完全免费并兼容 MySQL 或 Percona Server。

相干链接：GreatSQL 社区 Gitee GitHub Bilibili

GreatSQL 社区：

社区博客有奖征稿详情：https://greatsql.cn/thread-100-1-1.html

技术交换群：

微信：扫码增加 GreatSQL 社区助手 微信好友，发送验证信息 加群。

正文完
数据库
发表至： 数据库
2023-09-27
 0
关于数据库:恭喜埃文科技入选2021年中国网安产业潜力之星
关于数据库:Mysql索引分类
关于数据库:星环科技ArgoDB-32正式发布全面升级易用性性能和安全
关于数据库:5分钟入门Lindorm-SearchIndex