关于数据库:GreatSQL一个关于主从复制的限制描述与规避

一、背景

分享一个在我的项目运维中遇到的一个主从复制限度的一个坑,我的项目的架构为主集群+灾备集群,每个集群为一主两从模式。主集群到灾备集群的同步为主从复制的形式,依据业务需要灾备集群须要疏忽零碎库跟某些配置表,所以才会触发此限度,而这个限度如果咱们之前没有遇到过,那么排查起来也是绝对不易的。

二、限度形容

1、主从同步呈现报错

greatsql> show slave status\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
               Slave_IO_State: Waiting for master to send event
                  Master_Host: 192.168.xxx.xxx
                  Master_User: repl
                  Master_Port: 3306
                Connect_Retry: 60
              Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000990
          Read_Master_Log_Pos: 92274290
               Relay_Log_File: greatsql-relay.002963     -----
                Relay_Log_Pos: 701548899
        Relay_Master_Log_File: greatsql-bin.000988
             Slave_IO_Running: Yes
            Slave_SQL_Running: No
              Replicate_Do_DB:
          Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
           Replicate_Do_Table:
       Replicate_Ignore_Table:
      Replicate_Wild_Do_Table:
  Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc
                   Last_Errno: 1146
                   Last_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
                 Skip_Counter: 0
          Exec_Master_Log_Pos: 701548690
              Relay_Log_Space: 2246320360
              Until_Condition: None
               Until_Log_File:
                Until_Log_Pos: 0
           Master_SSL_Allowed: No
           Master_SSL_CA_File:
           Master_SSL_CA_Path:
              Master_SSL_Cert:
            Master_SSL_Cipher:
               Master_SSL_Key:
        Seconds_Behind_Master: NULL
Master_SSL_Verify_Server_Cert: No
                Last_IO_Errno: 0
                Last_IO_Error:
               Last_SQL_Errno: 1146
               Last_SQL_Error: Coordinator stopped because there were error(s) in the worker(s). The most recent failure being: Worker 1 failed executing transaction '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988, end_log_pos 701570116. See error log and/or performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker table for more details about this failure or others, if any.
  Replicate_Ignore_Server_Ids:
             Master_Server_Id: 1943306
                  Master_UUID: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb
             Master_Info_File: mysql.slave_master_info
                    SQL_Delay: 0
          SQL_Remaining_Delay: NULL
      Slave_SQL_Running_State:
           Master_Retry_Count: 86400
                  Master_Bind:
      Last_IO_Error_Timestamp:
     Last_SQL_Error_Timestamp: 230822 14:14:18
               Master_SSL_Crl:
           Master_SSL_Crlpath:
           Retrieved_Gtid_Set: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:2-47565802
            Executed_Gtid_Set: 30873cfe-8750-11ed-b56f-744aa4073024:1-270,
9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:1-47508256
                Auto_Position: 1
         Replicate_Rewrite_DB:  
                 Channel_Name:
           Master_TLS_Version:
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

依据slave status状态信息能够看出

  • 报错的GTID为:'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'
  • 利用的主集群的binlog为:greatsql-bin.000988
  • 灾备集群的relay log为:greatsql-relay.002963

详细信息查看performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker

2、查看谬误的详细信息

greatsql> select * from performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker\G
*************************** 1. row ***************************
         CHANNEL_NAME:
            WORKER_ID: 1
            THREAD_ID: NULL
        SERVICE_STATE: OFF
LAST_SEEN_TRANSACTION: 9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257
    LAST_ERROR_NUMBER: 1146
   LAST_ERROR_MESSAGE: Worker 1 failed executing transaction
'9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257' at master log greatdb-bin.000988,
end_log_pos 701570116; Error executing row event: 'Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist'
LAST_ERROR_TIMESTAMP: 2023-08-22 14:14:18

上述信息阐明依据performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker表中的具体错误信息能够发现为灾备集群abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info表不存在,导致同步报错

3、问题剖析

3.1、确认灾备集群中指标表是否存在

greatsql> show create table abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist
greatsql> desc abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info;
ERROR 1146 (42S02): Table 'abs_xxx.tmp_xxx_info' doesn't exist

论断:灾备集群中指标表确实不存在

3.2、依据主从报错信息解析主集群binlog,报错的SQL

解析主集群binlog

SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47508257'/*!*/;
……
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570000         Table_map: `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` mapped to number 1595
# at 701570000
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570116         Write_rows: table id 1595 flags: STMT_END_F
### INSERT INTO `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info`
### SET
###   @1=2
###   @2='自动化'
###   @3='2300121212120000'
###   @4='90000000'
###   @5='1'
###   @6='202001290231001'
###   @7='2021-01-31 00:00:00'
# at 701570116
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570143         Xid = 800998400
COMMIT/*!*/;
# at 701570143
#230822 14:14:18 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 701570204         GTID        last_committed=26491        sequence_number=26521        rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/;

论断:依据复制的报错信息得悉具体的GTID号以及主集群的binlog文件,解析binlog得悉此事务为一条INSERT语句,语句中的指标表与performance_schema.replication_applier_status_by_worker表中信息统一

3.3、寻找主集群指标表binlog中是否有建表语句

在同一binlog日志中寻找建表语句

SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS `abs_xxx` /*!40100 DEFAULT CHARACTER SET utf8 COLLATE utf8_bin */
/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
  `ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864451

论断:在主集群的binlog日志中找到了指标表的建表语句,阐明主集群执行DDL时并没有敞开binlog日志,那么持续查看在灾备集群的中继日志中是否存在DDL语句

3.4、解析灾备集群的中继日志,确认是否拉取到灾备集群

#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 475863662         GTID        last_committed=16341        sequence_number=16342        rbr_only=no
SET @@SESSION.GTID_NEXT= '9e668a93-2618-11ee-93ee-bc16954181bb:47498079'/*!*/;
……
use `information_schema`/*!*/;
SET TIMESTAMP=1692684495/*!*/;
CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
  `ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC
/*!*/;
# at 475864660
#230822 14:08:15 server id 1943306  end_log_pos 475864512         GTID        last_committed=16342        sequence_number=16343        rbr_only=yes
/*!50718 SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL READ COMMITTED*//*!*/; 

论断:灾备集群的中继日志中存在DDL建表语句,阐明并不是IO线程出了问题

3.5、排查复制配置的疏忽库表

Replicate_Ignore_DB: mysql,dbscale,dbscale_tmp,information_schema,performance_schema,sys
Replicate_Wild_Ignore_Table: A.ab,B.bc

论断:疏忽库表中并不蕴含指标表,然而依据以上解析日志发现,在主集群binlog日志中建表语句之前有个use information_schema/!/; 的语句,此库为同步疏忽的零碎库,因而触发了GreatSQL的标准限度,在疏忽库下对未疏忽进行操作Statement模式下记录语句默认不起作用 (详情:https://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.7/en/replication-options-r…)

4、解决同步报错

在灾备集群创立指标表

greatsql> CREATE TABLE `abs_xxx`.`tmp_xxx_info` (
  `ID` int(64) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `CUSTOMER_NAME` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `CUSTOMER_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `PRODIST_SKU_NUM` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `STATUS` varchar(64) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `AGREEMENT_NUM` varchar(256) COLLATE utf8mb4_bin DEFAULT NULL,
  `END_DATE` datetime DEFAULT NULL,
  PRIMARY KEY (`ID`),
  KEY `PK_PRODIST_SKU_NUM_AGREEMENT` (`PRODIST_SKU_NUM`) USING BTREE,
  KEY `IDX_AGREEMENT_NUM` (`AGREEMENT_NUM`) USING BTREE
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=2 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8mb4 COLLATE=utf8mb4_bin ROW_FORMAT=DYNAMIC;

greatsql> stop slave;
greatsql> start slave;

论断:在灾备集群创立指标表后重启复制复原胜利

三、限度躲避

1、第一种躲避形式

执行DDL时进入指标库

greatsql> use abs_cust
greatsql> DDL 语句(CREATE\DROP\ALTER)

阐明:在利用连贯数据库时有可能默认就是information_schema库,而此环境将零碎库全副疏忽,所以为了躲避相似的问题,请在执行SQL语句时请先use到指标表的指标库。

2、第二种躲避形式

批改主从复制配置,以下步骤为测试环境

敞开灾备集群在复制同步

greatsql> stop slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.03 sec)

批改疏忽库

greatsql> change replication filter Replicate_Ignore_DB=();

批改疏忽表

greatsql> change replication filter replicate_wild_ignore_table =('mysql.%','information_schema.%','sys.%','performance_schema.%');

启动同步

greatsql> start slave;
Query OK, 0 rows affected, 1 warning (0.37 sec)

测试验证

主集群:

greatsql> use mysql
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed

greatsql> create table test111.test111(id int primary key);
Query OK, 0 rows affected (0.06 sec)

greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111           |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

灾备集群:

greatsql> use test111
Reading table information for completion of table and column names
You can turn off this feature to get a quicker startup with -A
Database changed

greatsql> show tables;
+-------------------+
| Tables_in_test111 |
+-------------------+
| test111           |
+-------------------+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)

阐明:复制配置中参数Replicate_Ignore_DB设置为空,将replicate_wild_ignore_table参数设置为shema_name.%的形式也能够躲避相似的问题

四、特地阐明

  • 在MySQL 5.7跟8.0版本也存在此限度

Enjoy GreatSQL 🙂

## 对于 GreatSQL

GreatSQL是实用于金融级利用的国内自主开源数据库,具备高性能、高牢靠、高易用性、高平安等多个外围个性,能够作为MySQL或Percona Server的可选替换,用于线上生产环境,且完全免费并兼容MySQL或Percona Server。

相干链接: GreatSQL社区 Gitee GitHub Bilibili

GreatSQL社区:

社区博客有奖征稿详情:https://greatsql.cn/thread-100-1-1.html

技术交换群:

微信:扫码增加GreatSQL社区助手微信好友,发送验证信息加群

评论

发表回复

您的邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用 * 标注

这个站点使用 Akismet 来减少垃圾评论。了解你的评论数据如何被处理