关于深度学习:CS-285-DRL-Homework-2Policy-Gradients-策略优化

Exp 1：原始策略优化（Vanilla Policy Gradient）

Vanilla adj. 一般的，没有新意的；香草的

训练算法总体思路

次要的训练算法集中在 RL_Trainer.run_training_loop 中。通过观察一个循环（iteration）的调用过程，可总结为：

1. 收集多个路线,，取得 train_batch_size 个时刻的数据 存在 replay buffer 中
2. 上一步齐全完结之后 ，从 buffer 中采样最近 batch_size 个时刻数据

3. 用数据训练模型

   1. 先更新策略
   2. 再更新 baseline（第一节还不须要）

第一、二步是齐全串行的。且通过观察代码实现可知，尽管有 buffer 作数据直达，但 train_batch_size 与 batch_size 定义为相等，每次训练的数据都是上次模型更新之后的。因而仍然是 On-Policy RL。

第一局部次要须要补全 PGAgent.train，这一函数又牵扯到计算 总收益 Q，以及 policy update

两种 \(\hat{Q} \) 的计算：Reward-to-go or Not

留神这里是 \(\hat{Q} \)（Q-hat），是 单个蒙特卡洛采样门路的收益值，而不是 Q-learning 中神经网络给出的 状态 - 动作对 的预测价值。

Reward-to-go 就是思考因果的 Q 值，t 工夫点的的 Q 不思考 t 之前工夫点的收益。

不思考因果的：求和即可，每个地位的值都和时刻 t 无关，都是一样的。

    #####################################################
    ################## HELPER FUNCTIONS #################
    #####################################################
    def _discounted_return(self, rewards):
        """
            Helper function
            Input: list of rewards {r_0, r_1, ..., r_t', ... r_T} from a single rollout of length T
            Output: list where each index t contains sum_{t'=0}^T gamma^t' r_{t'}"""
        discounted_sum, discount = 0, 1
        for rr in rewards:
            discounted_sum += discount * rr
            discount *= self.gamma

        return [discounted_sum for i in range(len(rewards))]

思考 Reward-to-go 的：应用迭代的方法

$$
\begin{align}
\hat{Q}_{t}&=\sum_{t’=t}^{T} \gamma^{t’-t} * r_{t’}\\
&=\sum_{t’=t+1}^{T} \gamma^{t’-t} * r_{t’}+r_{t}\\
&=\gamma\sum_{t’=t+1}^{T} \gamma^{t’-t-1} * r_{t’}+r_{t}\\
&=\hat{Q}_{t+1}+r_{t}
\end{align}
$$

而 已知：

$$\hat{Q}_{T}=\sum_{t’=T}^{T} \gamma^{t’-T} * r_{t’}=r_{T}$$

    def _discounted_cumsum(self, rewards):
        """
            Helper function which
            -takes a list of rewards {r_0, r_1, ..., r_t', ... r_T},
            -and returns a list where the entry in each index t is sum_{t'=t}^T gamma^(t'-t) * r_{t'}
            (For Reward-to-go)
        """
        rtg_discounted_q = rewards.copy()
        for i in range(len(rtg_discounted_q)-2, -1, -1):
            rtg_discounted_q[i] = self.gamma * (rtg_discounted_q[i+1]) + rewards[i]

        return rtg_discounted_q

策略更新（Policy Updating）

策略优化的数学实质是：通过调整 策略概率模型 的散布， 最大化收益的期望值 。

但通过应用 对数求导 的数学技巧，策略优化指标函数从后果上讲，能够认为是 策略对数概率 的加权均匀 ，而权重是 收益值之和。因而收益越高的决策权重越大。（当然这是感性认识，而不是数学实质）

$$\nabla_{\theta} J(\theta) \approx \frac{1}{N} \sum_{i=1}^{N} \sum_{t=1}^{T} \nabla_{\theta} \log \pi_{\theta}\left(\mathbf{a}_{i, t} \mid \mathbf{s}_{i, t}\right) \hat{Q}_{i, t}^{\pi}$$

class MLPPolicyPG(MLPPolicy):
    def __init__(self, ac_dim, ob_dim, n_layers, size, **kwargs):

        super().__init__(ac_dim, ob_dim, n_layers, size, **kwargs)
        self.baseline_loss = nn.MSELoss()

    def update(self, observations, actions, advantages, q_values=None):
        observations = ptu.from_numpy(observations)
        actions = ptu.from_numpy(actions)
        advantages = ptu.from_numpy(advantages)

        self.optimizer.zero_grad()
        observations, actions, advantages = ptu.from_numpy(observations), ptu.from_numpy(actions), ptu.from_numpy(advantages)
        action_distribution = self.forward(observations)
        log_probs = action_distribution.log_prob(actions)
        loss = -torch.mul(log_probs, advantages).mean()
        loss.backward()
        self.optimizer.step()

        if self.nn_baseline:
            pass # omitted
        train_log = {'Training Loss': ptu.to_numpy(loss),
        }
        return train_log

Exp 2：Neural Network Baselines

Critic 模型用作 Baseline 或者 Critic

这届内容理论是在 Actor-Critic 章节的课程才讲的（）

Critic 模型指的是一个学习器（比方神经网络），输出是状态（或再加上动作），输入是这个状态（或 状态 - 动作 对）的价值。

这一节中尽管存在 Critic 神经网络模型，但它是作为 Baseline 应用，所以仍然是 Policy Gradient，而不是 Actor-Critic。分辨的准则是，PG 在策略更新中 Advantage 值的 被减数 仍然是蒙特卡洛采样 \(\hat{Q} \)

Baseline 模型训练

如上文思路，尽管有 buffer 作数据直达，但 train_batch_size 与 batch_size 定义为相等，每次训练的数据都是上次更新之后的。

因而，buffer 只是表象，实质上还是 On-policy RL。On-Policy 假如成立。

Baseline 模型的训练思路是 函数预计：神经网络的特色抽取和拟合能力，使得它可能辨认出不同但类似的状态，从而采取类似的决策。

这种能够认为是 蒙特卡洛法的延申解释。传统蒙特卡洛法须要在 完全相同 的输出上屡次采样（\(V^{\pi}\left(\mathbf{s}_{t}\right) \approx \frac{1}{N}\sum_{i=1}^{N}\sum_{t^{\prime}=t}^{T} r\left(\mathbf{s}_{t^{\prime}}, \mathbf{a}_{t^{\prime}}\right) \)），这在大部分的 强化学习环境都是不可能的。

当然这里还额定思考了 收益的工夫递加。

class MLPPolicyPG(MLPPolicy):
    def __init__(self, ac_dim, ob_dim, n_layers, size, **kwargs):

        super().__init__(ac_dim, ob_dim, n_layers, size, **kwargs)
        self.baseline_loss = nn.MSELoss()

    def update(self, observations, actions, advantages, q_values=None):
        # Updating Policy (omitted)

        if self.nn_baseline:
            ## TODO: update the neural network baseline using the q_values as
            ## targets. The q_values should first be normalized to have a mean
            ## of zero and a standard deviation of one.

            ## Note: You will need to convert the targets into a tensor using
                ## ptu.from_numpy before using it in the loss
            assert q_values is not None
            self.baseline_optimizer.zero_grad()
            q_values = ptu.from_numpy(q_values) if isinstance(q_values, np.ndarray) else q_values
            q_mean, q_std = torch.mean(q_values), torch.std(q_values)
            q_values = (q_values - q_mean).divide(q_std)
            values = self.baseline(observations)
            print(values.shape, q_values.shape)
            b_loss = self.baseline_loss(values, q_values)
            b_loss.backward()
            self.baseline_optimizer.step()

        train_log = {'Training Loss': ptu.to_numpy(loss),
        }
        return train_log

引入 Baselines

很简略：

def estimate_advantage(self, obs: np.ndarray, rews_list: np.ndarray, q_values: np.ndarray, terminals: np.ndarray):

    """Computes advantages by (possibly) using GAE, or subtracting a baseline from the estimated Q values"""

    # Estimate the advantage when nn_baseline is True,
    # by querying the neural network that you're using to learn the value function
    if self.nn_baseline:
        values_unnormalized = self.actor.run_baseline_prediction(obs)
        ## ensure that the value predictions and q_values have the same dimensionality
        ## to prevent silent broadcasting errors
        assert values_unnormalized.ndim == q_values.ndim
        ## TODO: values were trained with standardized q_values, so ensure
            ## that the predictions have the same mean and standard deviation as
            ## the current batch of q_values
        values = values_unnormalized * q_values.std() + q_values.mean()

        batch_size = obs.shape[0]
        if self.gae_lambda is not None:
            pass # TODO
        else:
            ## TODO: compute advantage estimates using q_values, and values as baselines
            advantages = np.zeros(batch_size)
            for i in range(batch_size):
                advantages[i] = q_values[i] - values[i]

    # Else, just set the advantage to [Q]
    else:
        advantages = q_values.copy()

    # Normalize the resulting advantages to have a mean of zero
    # and a standard deviation of one
    if self.standardize_advantages:
        ad_mean, ad_std = np.average(advantages), np.std(advantages)
        advantages = (advantages - ad_mean) / ad_std
    return advantages

Exp 3：GAE

def estimate_advantage(self, obs: np.ndarray, rews_list: np.ndarray, q_values: np.ndarray, terminals: np.ndarray):

    """Computes advantages by (possibly) using GAE, or subtracting a baseline from the estimated Q values"""

    # Estimate the advantage when nn_baseline is True,
    # by querying the neural network that you're using to learn the value function
    if self.nn_baseline:
        values_unnormalized = self.actor.run_baseline_prediction(obs)
        assert values_unnormalized.ndim == q_values.ndim
        values = values_unnormalized * q_values.std() + q_values.mean()
        batch_size = obs.shape[0]
        if self.gae_lambda is not None:
            ## append a dummy T+1 value for simpler recursive calculation
            values = np.append(values, [0])

            ## combine rews_list into a single array
            rews = np.concatenate(rews_list)

            ## create empty numpy array to populate with GAE advantage
            ## estimates, with dummy T+1 value for simpler recursive calculation
            advantages = np.zeros(batch_size + 1)
            flatten_rews = np.concatenate(rews_list)

            for i in reversed(range(batch_size)):
                ## TODO: recursively compute advantage estimates starting from
                    ## timestep T.
                ## HINT: use terminals to handle edge cases. terminals[i]
                    ## is 1 if the state is the last in its trajectory, and
                    ## 0 otherwise.
                if terminals[i]:
                    advantages[i] = flatten_rews[i] - values[i]
                else:
                    delta = flatten_rews[i] + self.gamma * values[i+1] - values[i]
                    advantages[i] = delta + self.gamma * advantages[i+1]
        else:
            advantages = np.zeros(batch_size)
            for i in range(batch_size):
                advantages[i] = q_values[i] - values[i]
    else:
        advantages = q_values.copy()

    # Normalize the resulting advantages to have a mean of zero
    # and a standard deviation of one
    if self.standardize_advantages:
        ad_mean, ad_std = np.average(advantages), np.std(advantages)
        advantages = (advantages - ad_mean) / ad_std
    return advantages