共计 13008 个字符，预计需要花费 33 分钟才能阅读完成。
背景：这个是在 3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 遇到的一例 crash。上面列一下咱们是怎么排查并解这个问题的。
一、故障景象
Oppo 云智能监控发现机器 down 机：
KERNEL: /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/vmlinux
....
PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP"
PID: 14
COMMAND: "migration/1"
TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040 [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f1bf6bc4000]
CPU: 1
STATE: TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (PANIC)
crash> bt
PID: 14 TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040 CPU: 1 COMMAND: "migration/1"
#0 [ffff8f4afbe089f0] machine_kexec at ffffffff83863674
#1 [ffff8f4afbe08a50] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8391ce12
#2 [ffff8f4afbe08b20] panic at ffffffff83f5b4db
#3 [ffff8f4afbe08ba0] nmi_panic at ffffffff8389739f
#4 [ffff8f4afbe08bb0] watchdog_overflow_callback at ffffffff83949241
#5 [ffff8f4afbe08bc8] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff839a1027
#6 [ffff8f4afbe08c00] perf_event_overflow at ffffffff839aa694
#7 [ffff8f4afbe08c10] intel_pmu_handle_irq at ffffffff8380a6b0
#8 [ffff8f4afbe08e38] perf_event_nmi_handler at ffffffff83f6b031
#9 [ffff8f4afbe08e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff83f6c8fc
#10 [ffff8f4afbe08eb0] do_nmi at ffffffff83f6cbd8
#11 [ffff8f4afbe08ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69
[exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+462]
RIP: ffffffff839121ae RSP: ffff8f1bf6bc7c50 RFLAGS: 00000002
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: 0000000000000082 RCX: 0000000000000001
RDX: 0000000000000101 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffff8f1afdf55fe8--- 锁
RBP: ffff8f1bf6bc7c50 R8: 0000000000000101 R9: 0000000000000400
R10: 000000000000499e R11: 000000000000499f R12: ffff8f1afdf55fe8
R13: ffff8f1bf5150000 R14: ffff8f1afdf5b488 R15: ffff8f1bf5187818
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0018
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#12 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c50] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff839121ae
#13 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c58] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff83f5bf4b
#14 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c68] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff83f6a487
#15 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c80] cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc70
#16 [ffff8f1bf6bc7cb0] stop_one_cpu_nowait at ffffffff83930450
#17 [ffff8f1bf6bc7cc0] load_balance at ffffffff838e4c6e
#18 [ffff8f1bf6bc7da8] idle_balance at ffffffff838e5451
#19 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e00] __schedule at ffffffff83f67b14
#20 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e88] schedule at ffffffff83f67bc9
#21 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e98] smpboot_thread_fn at ffffffff838ca562
#22 [ffff8f1bf6bc7ec8] kthread at ffffffff838c1c31
#23 [ffff8f1bf6bc7f50] ret_from_fork_nospec_begin at ffffffff83f74c1d
crash> 二、故障景象剖析
hardlock 个别是因为关中断工夫过长，从堆栈看，下面的 ”migration/1″ 过程在抢 spinlock，
因为_raw_spin_lock_irqsave 会先调用 arch_local_irq_disable, 而后再去拿锁，而
arch_local_irq_disable 是常见的关中断函数, 上面剖析这个过程想要拿的锁被谁拿着。
x86 架构下，native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath 的 rdi 就是寄存锁地址的
x86 架构下，native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath 的 rdi 就是寄存锁地址的
crash> arch_spinlock_t ffff8f1afdf55fe8
struct arch_spinlock_t {
val = {counter = 257}
}上面，咱们须要理解，这个是一把什么锁。
从调用链分析 idle_balance–>load_balance–>stop_one_cpu_nowait–>cpu_stop_queue_work
反汇编 cpu_stop_queue_work 拿锁阻塞的代码：
crash> dis -l ffffffff8392fc70
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/stop_machine.c: 91
0xffffffff8392fc70 <cpu_stop_queue_work+48>: cmpb $0x0,0xc(%rbx)
85 static void cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_stop_work *work)
86 {87 struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);
88 unsigned long flags;
89
90 spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);--- 所以是卡在拿这把锁
91 if (stopper->enabled)
92 __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper, work);
93 else
94 cpu_stop_signal_done(work->done, false);
95 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);
96 }看起来 须要依据 cpu 号，来获取对应的 percpu 变量 cpu_stopper, 这个入参在 load_balance 函数中找到的
最忙的 rq，而后获取其对应的 cpu 号:
6545 static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,
6546 struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,
6547 int *should_balance)
6548 {
....
6735 if (active_balance) {6736 stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(busiest),
6737 active_load_balance_cpu_stop, busiest,
6738 &busiest->active_balance_work);
6739 }
....
6781 }
crash> dis -l load_balance |grep stop_one_cpu_nowait -B 6
0xffffffff838e4c4d <load_balance+2045>: callq 0xffffffff83f6a0e0 <_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore>
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/sched/fair.c: 6736
0xffffffff838e4c52 <load_balance+2050>: mov 0x930(%rbx),%edi------------ 依据 rbx 能够取 cpu 号，rbx 就是最忙的 rq
0xffffffff838e4c58 <load_balance+2056>: lea 0x908(%rbx),%rcx
0xffffffff838e4c5f <load_balance+2063>: mov %rbx,%rdx
0xffffffff838e4c62 <load_balance+2066>: mov $0xffffffff838de690,%rsi
0xffffffff838e4c69 <load_balance+2073>: callq 0xffffffff83930420 <stop_one_cpu_nowait>而后咱们再栈中取的数据如下：
最忙的组是：crash> rq.cpu ffff8f1afdf5ab80
cpu = 26也就是说，1 号 cpu 在等 percpu 变量 cpu_stopper 的 26 号 cpu 的锁。
而后咱们搜寻这把锁在其余哪个过程的栈中，找到了如下：
ffff8f4957fbfab0: ffff8f1afdf55fe8 -------- 这个在 355608 的栈中
crash> kmem ffff8f4957fbfab0
PID: 355608
COMMAND: "custom_exporter"
TASK: ffff8f4aea3a8000 [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f4957fbc000]
CPU: 26-------- 刚好也是运行在 26 号 cpu 的过程
STATE: TASK_RUNNING (ACTIVE)上面，就须要剖析，为什么位于 26 号 cpu 的过程 custom_exporter 会长工夫拿着 ffff8f1afdf55fe8
咱们来剖析 26 号 cpu 的堆栈：
crash> bt -f 355608
PID: 355608 TASK: ffff8f4aea3a8000 CPU: 26 COMMAND: "custom_exporter"
.....
#3 [ffff8f1afdf48ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69
[exception RIP: try_to_wake_up+114]
RIP: ffffffff838d63d2 RSP: ffff8f4957fbfa30 RFLAGS: 00000002
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8f1bf6bb9844 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff8f1bf6bb9844
RBP: ffff8f4957fbfa70 R8: ffff8f4afbe15ff0 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff8f1bf6bb9040 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#4 [ffff8f4957fbfa30] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff838d63d2
ffff8f4957fbfa38: 000000000001ab80 0000000000000086
ffff8f4957fbfa48: ffff8f4afbe15fe0 ffff8f4957fbfb48
ffff8f4957fbfa58: 0000000000000001 ffff8f4afbe15fe0
ffff8f4957fbfa68: ffff8f1afdf55fe0 ffff8f4957fbfa80
ffff8f4957fbfa78: ffffffff838d6705
#5 [ffff8f4957fbfa78] wake_up_process at ffffffff838d6705
ffff8f4957fbfa80: ffff8f4957fbfa98 ffffffff8392fc05
#6 [ffff8f4957fbfa88] __cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc05
ffff8f4957fbfa90: 000000000000001a ffff8f4957fbfbb0
ffff8f4957fbfaa0: ffffffff8393037a
#7 [ffff8f4957fbfaa0] stop_two_cpus at ffffffff8393037a
.....
ffff8f4957fbfbb8: ffffffff838d3867
#8 [ffff8f4957fbfbb8] migrate_swap at ffffffff838d3867
ffff8f4957fbfbc0: ffff8f4aea3a8000 ffff8f1ae77dc100 ------- 栈中的 migration_swap_arg
ffff8f4957fbfbd0: 000000010000001a 0000000080490f7c
ffff8f4957fbfbe0: ffff8f4aea3a8000 ffff8f4957fbfc30
ffff8f4957fbfbf0: 0000000000000076 0000000000000076
ffff8f4957fbfc00: 0000000000000371 ffff8f4957fbfce8
ffff8f4957fbfc10: ffffffff838dd0ba
#9 [ffff8f4957fbfc10] task_numa_migrate at ffffffff838dd0ba
ffff8f4957fbfc18: ffff8f1afc121f40 000000000000001a
ffff8f4957fbfc28: 0000000000000371 ffff8f4aea3a8000 --- 这里 ffff8f4957fbfc30 就是 task_numa_env 的寄存在栈中的地址
ffff8f4957fbfc38: 000000000000001a 000000010000003f
ffff8f4957fbfc48: 000000000000000b 000000000000022c
ffff8f4957fbfc58: 00000000000049a0 0000000000000012
ffff8f4957fbfc68: 0000000000000001 0000000000000003
ffff8f4957fbfc78: 000000000000006f 000000000000499f
ffff8f4957fbfc88: 0000000000000012 0000000000000001
ffff8f4957fbfc98: 0000000000000070 ffff8f1ae77dc100
ffff8f4957fbfca8: 00000000000002fb 0000000000000001
ffff8f4957fbfcb8: 0000000080490f7c ffff8f4aea3a8000 ---rbx 压栈在此，所以这个就是 current
ffff8f4957fbfcc8: 0000000000017a48 0000000000001818
ffff8f4957fbfcd8: 0000000000000018 ffff8f4957fbfe20
ffff8f4957fbfce8: ffff8f4957fbfcf8 ffffffff838dd4d3
#10 [ffff8f4957fbfcf0] numa_migrate_preferred at ffffffff838dd4d3
ffff8f4957fbfcf8: ffff8f4957fbfd88 ffffffff838df5b0
.....
crash>
crash> 整体上看，26 号上的 cpu 也正在进行 numa 的 balance 动作，简略开展介绍一下 numa 在 balance 下的动作
在 task_tick_fair 函数中：
static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued)
{
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;
struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se;
for_each_sched_entity(se) {cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);
entity_tick(cfs_rq, se, queued);
}
if (numabalancing_enabled)---------- 如果开启 numabalancing，则会调用 task_tick_numa
task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
update_rq_runnable_avg(rq, 1);
}而 task_tick_numa 会依据扫描状况，将以后过程须要 numa_balance 的时候推送到一个 work 中。
通过调用 change_prot_numa 将所有映射到 VMA 的 PTE 页表项该为 PAGE_NONE，使得下次过程拜访页表的时候
产生缺页中断，handle_pte_fault 函数 会因为缺页中断的机会来依据 numa 抉择更好的 node，具体不再开展。
在 26 号 cpu 的调用链中，stop_two_cpus–>cpu_stop_queue_two_works–>__cpu_stop_queue_work 函数
因为 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 被内联了，然而 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 调用 __cpu_stop_queue_work
有两次，所以须要依据压栈地址判断以后是哪次调用呈现问题。
227 static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,
228 int cpu2, struct cpu_stop_work *work2)
229 {230 struct cpu_stopper *stopper1 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu1);
231 struct cpu_stopper *stopper2 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu2);
232 int err;
233
234 lg_double_lock(&stop_cpus_lock, cpu1, cpu2);
235 spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);--- 留神到这里曾经持有了 stopper1 的锁
236 spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
.....
243 __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1);
244 __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2);
.....
251 }
依据压栈的地址:
#5 [ffff8f4957fbfa78] wake_up_process at ffffffff838d6705
ffff8f4957fbfa80: ffff8f4957fbfa98 ffffffff8392fc05
#6 [ffff8f4957fbfa88] __cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc05
ffff8f4957fbfa90: 000000000000001a ffff8f4957fbfbb0
ffff8f4957fbfaa0: ffffffff8393037a
#7 [ffff8f4957fbfaa0] stop_two_cpus at ffffffff8393037a
ffff8f4957fbfaa8: 0000000100000001 ffff8f1afdf55fe8
crash> dis -l ffffffff8393037a 2
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/stop_machine.c: 244
0xffffffff8393037a <stop_two_cpus+394>: lea 0x48(%rsp),%rsi
0xffffffff8393037f <stop_two_cpus+399>: mov %r15,%rdi阐明压栈的是 244 行的地址，也就是说目前调用的是 243 行的 __cpu_stop_queue_work。
而后剖析对应的入参：
crash> task_numa_env ffff8f4957fbfc30
struct task_numa_env {
p = 0xffff8f4aea3a8000,
src_cpu = 26,
src_nid = 0,
dst_cpu = 63,
dst_nid = 1,
src_stats = {
nr_running = 11,
load = 556, ---load 高
compute_capacity = 18848, --- 容量相当
task_capacity = 18,
has_free_capacity = 1
},
dst_stats = {
nr_running = 3,
load = 111, ---load 低，且容量相当，要迁徙过去
compute_capacity = 18847, --- 容量相当
task_capacity = 18,
has_free_capacity = 1
},
imbalance_pct = 112,
idx = 0,
best_task = 0xffff8f1ae77dc100, --- 要对调的 task，是通过 task_numa_find_cpu-->task_numa_compare-->task_numa_assign 来获取的
best_imp = 763,
best_cpu = 1--- 最佳的 swap 的对象对于 1 号 cpu
}
crash> migration_swap_arg ffff8f4957fbfbc0
struct migration_swap_arg {
src_task = 0xffff8f4aea3a8000,
dst_task = 0xffff8f1ae77dc100,
src_cpu = 26,
dst_cpu = 1----- 抉择的 dst cpu 为 1
}依据 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 的代码，它在持有 cpu_stopper:26 号 cpu 锁的状况下，去
调用 try_to_wake_up，wake 的对象是 用来 migrate 的 kworker。
static void __cpu_stop_queue_work(struct cpu_stopper *stopper,
struct cpu_stop_work *work)
{list_add_tail(&work->list, &stopper->works);
wake_up_process(stopper->thread);// 其实个别就是唤醒 migration
}因为最佳的 cpu 对象为 1，所以须要 cpu 上的 migrate 来拉取过程。
crash> p cpu_stopper:1
per_cpu(cpu_stopper, 1) = $33 = {
thread = 0xffff8f1bf6bb9040, ---- 须要唤醒的目标 task
lock = {
{
rlock = {
raw_lock = {
val = {counter = 1}
}
}
}
},
enabled = true,
works = {
next = 0xffff8f4957fbfac0,
prev = 0xffff8f4957fbfac0
},
stop_work = {
list = {
next = 0xffff8f4afbe16000,
prev = 0xffff8f4afbe16000
},
fn = 0xffffffff83952100,
arg = 0x0,
done = 0xffff8f1ae3647c08
}
}
crash> kmem 0xffff8f1bf6bb9040
CACHE NAME OBJSIZE ALLOCATED TOTAL SLABS SSIZE
ffff8eecffc05f00 task_struct 4152 1604 2219 317 32k
SLAB MEMORY NODE TOTAL ALLOCATED FREE
fffff26501daee00 ffff8f1bf6bb8000 1 7 7 0
FREE / [ALLOCATED]
[ffff8f1bf6bb9040]
PID: 14
COMMAND: "migration/1"-------------- 目标 task 就是对应的 cpu 上的 migration
TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040 [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f1bf6bc4000]
CPU: 1
STATE: TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (PANIC)
PAGE PHYSICAL MAPPING INDEX CNT FLAGS
fffff26501daee40 3076bb9000 0 0 0 6fffff00008000 tail
当初的问题是，尽管咱们晓得了以后 cpu26 号过程在拿了锁的状况上来唤醒 1 号 cpu 上的 migrate 过程，
那么为什么会迟迟不开释锁，导致 1 号 cpu 因为期待该锁工夫过长而触发了 hardlock 的 panic 呢？
上面就剖析，为什么它持锁的工夫这么长：
#3 [ffff8f1afdf48ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69
[exception RIP: try_to_wake_up+114]
RIP: ffffffff838d63d2 RSP: ffff8f4957fbfa30 RFLAGS: 00000002
RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff8f1bf6bb9844 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: 0000000000000003 RDI: ffff8f1bf6bb9844
RBP: ffff8f4957fbfa70 R8: ffff8f4afbe15ff0 R9: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff8f1bf6bb9040 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000003
ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff CS: 0010 SS: 0000
--- <NMI exception stack> ---
#4 [ffff8f4957fbfa30] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff838d63d2
ffff8f4957fbfa38: 000000000001ab80 0000000000000086
ffff8f4957fbfa48: ffff8f4afbe15fe0 ffff8f4957fbfb48
ffff8f4957fbfa58: 0000000000000001 ffff8f4afbe15fe0
ffff8f4957fbfa68: ffff8f1afdf55fe0 ffff8f4957fbfa80
crash> dis -l ffffffff838d63d2
/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/sched/core.c: 1790
0xffffffff838d63d2 <try_to_wake_up+114>: mov 0x28(%r13),%eax
1721 static int
1722 try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)
1723 {
.....
1787 * If the owning (remote) cpu is still in the middle of schedule() with
1788 * this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task.
1789 */
1790 while (p->on_cpu)--------- 原来循环在此
1791 cpu_relax();
.....
1814 return success;
1815 }咱们用一个简略的图来示意一下这个 hardlock：
CPU1 CPU26
schedule(.prev=migrate/1) <fault>
pick_next_task() ...
idle_balance() migrate_swap()
active_balance() stop_two_cpus()
spin_lock(stopper0->lock)
spin_lock(stopper1->lock)
try_to_wake_up
pause() -- waits for schedule()
stop_one_cpu(1)
spin_lock(stopper26->lock) -- waits for stopper lock查看上游的补丁，
static void __cpu_stop_queue_work(struct cpu_stopper *stopper,
- struct cpu_stop_work *work)
+ struct cpu_stop_work *work,
+ struct wake_q_head *wakeq)
{list_add_tail(&work->list, &stopper->works);
- wake_up_process(stopper->thread);
+ wake_q_add(wakeq, stopper->thread);
}三、故障复现
因为这个是一个 race condition 导致的 hardlock，逻辑上剖析曾经没有问题了，就没有花工夫去复现，
该环境运行一个 dpdk 的 node，不过为了性能设置了只在一个 numa 节点上运行，能够频繁造成 numa 的不平衡，所以要复现的同学，
能够参考单 numa 节点上运行 dpdk 来复现，会概率大一些。
四、故障躲避或解决
咱们的解决方案是：
- 敞开 numa 的主动 balance.
- 手工合入 linux 社区的 0b26351b910f 补丁
- 这个补丁在 centos 的 3.10.0-974.el7 合入了:
[kernel] stop_machine, sched: Fix migrate_swap() vs. active_balance() deadlock (Phil Auld) [1557061]
同时红帽又反向合入到了 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64，所以把 centos 内核降级到 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64 也是一种抉择。
正文完