StringBuilder
package com.keytech.task;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
//线程不平安
public class StringExample1 {
public static Integer clientTotal=5000;
public static Integer threadTotal=200;
public static StringBuilder stringBuilder=new StringBuilder();
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
final Semaphore semaphore=new Semaphore(threadTotal);
final CountDownLatch countDownLatch=new CountDownLatch(clientTotal);
for (int i = 0; i < clientTotal; i++) {
executorService.execute(()->{
try{
semaphore.acquire();
update();
semaphore.release();
}catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
countDownLatch.countDown();
});
}
countDownLatch.await();
executorService.shutdown();
System.out.println("size"+stringBuilder.length());
}
private static void update() {
stringBuilder.append("1");
}
}
//size:4999
main函数中输入的后果不为预期的5000,并且每次后果可能会不统一,因而StringBuilder是线程不安全类
StringBuffer
package com.keytech.task;
import java.util.concurrent.CountDownLatch;
import java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService;
import java.util.concurrent.Executors;
import java.util.concurrent.Semaphore;
//线程平安
public class StringExample2 {
public static Integer clientTotal=5000;
public static Integer threadTotal=200;
public static StringBuffer stringBuffer=new StringBuffer();
public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception{
ExecutorService executorService = Executors.newCachedThreadPool();
final Semaphore semaphore=new Semaphore(threadTotal);
final CountDownLatch countDownLatch=new CountDownLatch(threadTotal);
for (int i = 0; i < clientTotal; i++) {
executorService.execute(()->{
try{
semaphore.acquire();
update();
semaphore.release();
}catch (Exception e){
e.printStackTrace();
}
countDownLatch.countDown();
});
}
countDownLatch.await();
executorService.shutdown();
System.out.println("size:"+stringBuffer.length());
}
private static void update() {
stringBuffer.append("1");
}
}
//size:5000
StringBuffer每次输入的后果与预期后果统一,因而它是线程平安的类
StringBuffer应用synchronized保障线程平安
@Override
public synchronized StringBuffer append(String str) {
toStringCache = null;
super.append(str);
return this;
}
总结
通过以上两个例子能够晓得,StringBuffer为线程安全类,StringBuilder为线程不安全类。
StringBuffer在办法的实现上应用了synchronized关键字对办法进行同步,因而是线程平安的,而StringBuilder则没有进行非凡的同步或并发解决。
StringBuffer应用了同步锁,同一时间只能有一个线程进行拜访,因为在零碎性能会有损耗,实用于多线程环境下应用。通常状况下,字符串拼接呈现在办法内(在办法中以局部变量的形式应用,能够做到线程关闭),应用StringBuilder进行字符串的拼接会大大提高性能,属于堆栈关闭,单个线程的操作对象,因而不存在线程不平安问题,优先选择应用StringBuilder。两种字符串拼接类别离实用不同的场景,这就是为什么JAVA同时提供了这两品种。
关注微信公众号:【入门小站】,解锁更多常识
发表回复