bean 的加载(二)
之前文章次要对 getBean 办法进行简略的介绍,和 FactoryBean 的作用,以及是如何从缓存中获取 bean。本文持续解说 bean 的加载流程。
从 bean 的实例中获取对象
在 getBean 办法里,getObjectForBeanInstance()
是个罕用的办法,无论是从缓存中获取 bean 还是依据不同 scope 策略来加载 bean。总而言之,咱们在获取到 bean 实例后第一步就是调用这个办法来检测正确性,其实就是检测以后 bean 是否为 FactoryBean 类型的 bean,如果是则调用 FactoryBean 实例的 getObject()作为返回值。
须要留神的是无论是缓存中获取到的 bean 还是通过 scope 策略加载的 bean 都是原始的 bean 状态,咱们须要的是工厂 bean 中定义 factory-method 办法中返回的 bean,而 getObjectForBeanInstance 办法就是实现这个工作的。
protected Object getObjectForBeanInstance( Object beanInstance, String name, String beanName, @Nullable RootBeanDefinition mbd) { //如果指定的name是工厂相干以"&"为前缀,并且beanInstance又不是FactoryBean则校验不通过 if (BeanFactoryUtils.isFactoryDereference(name)) { if (beanInstance instanceof NullBean) { return beanInstance; } if (!(beanInstance instanceof FactoryBean)) { throw new BeanIsNotAFactoryException(beanName, beanInstance.getClass()); } if (mbd != null) { mbd.isFactoryBean = true; } return beanInstance; } //当初咱们有了这个bean实例,这个实例可能是FactoryBean,也可能是失常的bean //如果是FactoryBean的话,咱们应用它创立实例,但如果是用户想要间接获取工厂实例而不是工厂的getObject办法则须要在BeanName前加上"&" if (!(beanInstance instanceof FactoryBean)) { return beanInstance; } //加载FactoryBean Object object = null; if (mbd != null) { mbd.isFactoryBean = true; } else { //尝试从缓存中加载bean object = getCachedObjectForFactoryBean(beanName); } if (object == null) { // 执行到这里表明beanInstance肯定是一个FactoryBean FactoryBean<?> factory = (FactoryBean<?>) beanInstance; // containsBeanDefinition检测BeanDefinitionMap中也就是在所有一键加载的类中检测是否定义beanName if (mbd == null && containsBeanDefinition(beanName)) { //将GenericBeanDefinition转换为RootBeanDefinition,如果指定BeanName是子bean的话同时会合并父类的属性 mbd = getMergedLocalBeanDefinition(beanName); } //是否是用户定义的而不是应用程序自身定义的 boolean synthetic = (mbd != null && mbd.isSynthetic()); object = getObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName, !synthetic); } return object;}
咱们先看一下 getObjectForBeanInstance 次要做了什么:
- 对 FactoryBean 正确性进行验证
- 对非 FactoryBean 不作任何解决
- 对 bean 进行转换
- 将从 Factory 中解析 bean 的工作委托给了
getObjectFromFactoryBean
。
该段代码大多都是辅助代码,真正的外围代码委托给了getObjectFromFactoryBean
。
protected Object getObjectFromFactoryBean(FactoryBean<?> factory, String beanName, boolean shouldPostProcess) { if (factory.isSingleton() && containsSingleton(beanName)) { synchronized (getSingletonMutex()) { Object object = this.factoryBeanObjectCache.get(beanName); if (object == null) { //重点办法 doGetObjectFromFactoryBean object = doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName); //...省略 } else { //重点办法 doGetObjectFromFactoryBean Object object = doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName); if (shouldPostProcess) { try { object = postProcessObjectFromFactoryBean(object, beanName); } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanCreationException(beanName, "Post-processing of FactoryBean's object failed", ex); } } return object; }}
这段代码就是返回的 bean 如果是单例的则须要保障全局惟一,也正因为是单例的所以不用反复创立,能够用缓存来进步性能。
咱们进入doGetObjectFromFactoryBean
办法中。
private Object doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(final FactoryBean<?> factory, final String beanName) throws BeanCreationException { Object object; try { //是否须要权限校验 if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) { AccessControlContext acc = getAccessControlContext(); try { object = AccessController.doPrivileged((PrivilegedExceptionAction<Object>) factory::getObject, acc); } catch (PrivilegedActionException pae) { throw pae.getException(); } } else { //间接调用getObject办法(重点) object = factory.getObject(); } } catch (FactoryBeanNotInitializedException ex) { throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName, ex.toString()); } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanCreationException(beanName, "FactoryBean threw exception on object creation", ex); } // Do not accept a null value for a FactoryBean that's not fully // initialized yet: Many FactoryBeans just return null then. if (object == null) { if (isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) { throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException( beanName, "FactoryBean which is currently in creation returned null from getObject"); } object = new NullBean(); } return object;}
在该办法中,咱们终于看到了想要看到的代码,也就是object = factory.getObject()
。之前咱们曾经讲过了 FactoryBean 的调用办法,如果 bean 是 FactoryBean 类型,则当提取 bean 时提取的并不是 factoryBean 而是 factoryBean 的 getObject 办法的返回值。
获取单例
之前咱们说过如果缓存中不存在曾经加载的 bean 则须要重头开始 bean 的加载,在 Spring 中应用 getSingleton 的重载办法实现了 bean 的加载过程。
getBean 办法:
// 实例化依赖的bean后就能够实例化mbd自身了// 如果BeanDefinition为单例if (mbd.isSingleton()) { //创立Bean实例对象,并且注册给所依赖的对象 sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> { try { return createBean(beanName, mbd, args); } catch (BeansException ex) { //从单例缓存中删除bean实例 //因为单例模式下为了解决循环依赖,可能它曾经存在了,所以将其销毁 destroySingleton(beanName); throw ex; } }); //如果是一般bean,间接返回,如果是FactoryBean,则返回它的getObject bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(sharedInstance, name, beanName, mbd);}
进入 getSingleton 办法:
public Object getSingleton(String beanName, ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory) { Assert.notNull(beanName, "Bean name must not be null"); //加锁 synchronized (this.singletonObjects) { //首先查看对应的bean是否曾经加载过, Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName); //如果为空则须要进行singleton的bean初始化 if (singletonObject == null) { if (this.singletonsCurrentlyInDestruction) { throw new BeanCreationNotAllowedException(beanName, "Singleton bean creation not allowed while singletons of this factory are in destruction " + "(Do not request a bean from a BeanFactory in a destroy method implementation!)"); } if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { logger.debug("Creating shared instance of singleton bean '" + beanName + "'"); } //代码(1) beforeSingletonCreation(beanName); boolean newSingleton = false; boolean recordSuppressedExceptions = (this.suppressedExceptions == null); if (recordSuppressedExceptions) { this.suppressedExceptions = new LinkedHashSet<>(); } try { // 通过回调形式获取bean实例。 singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject(); newSingleton = true; } catch (IllegalStateException ex) { // Has the singleton object implicitly appeared in the meantime -> // if yes, proceed with it since the exception indicates that state. singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName); if (singletonObject == null) { throw ex; } } catch (BeanCreationException ex) { if (recordSuppressedExceptions) { for (Exception suppressedException : this.suppressedExceptions) { ex.addRelatedCause(suppressedException); } } throw ex; } finally { if (recordSuppressedExceptions) { this.suppressedExceptions = null; } //代码(2) afterSingletonCreation(beanName); } if (newSingleton) { //退出缓存 代码(3) addSingleton(beanName, singletonObject); } } return singletonObject; }}
上述代码应用了回调办法,在单例创立的前后做了些筹备及解决操作,而真正获取单例 bean 的办法是在 ObjectFactory 类型的实例 singletonFactory 中。咱们先看一下 getSingleton 办法次要做了什么:
- 查看缓存是否曾经加载过
- 若没有加载,则记录 beanName 为正在加载状态
- 加载单例前记录加载状态,代码(1)
protected void beforeSingletonCreation(String beanName) { if (!this.inCreationCheckExclusions.contains(beanName) && !this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.add(beanName)) { throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName); }}
这个办法次要做的就是记录加载状态,this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.add(beanName)
将以后正要创立的 bean 记录在缓存中,这样就能够对循环依赖进行检测。
- 获取 bean 实例
- 调用加载单例后的解决办法,代码(2)
protected void afterSingletonCreation(String beanName) { if (!this.inCreationCheckExclusions.contains(beanName) && !this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.remove(beanName)) { throw new IllegalStateException("Singleton '" + beanName + "' isn't currently in creation"); }}
和上述相似,只是这里是从缓存中移除 bean 的正在加载状态。
- 将 bean 退出缓存,并删除加载 bean 过程中所记录的各种辅助状态。
protected void addSingleton(String beanName, Object singletonObject) { synchronized (this.singletonObjects) { this.singletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject); this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName); this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName); this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName); }}
- 返回处理结果
当初咱们曾经理解了 bean 的逻辑架构,然而 bean 的加载逻辑是在传入 ObjectFactory 类型的参数 singletonFactory 中定义的。
//创立Bean实例对象,并且注册给所依赖的对象sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> { try { return createBean(beanName, mbd, args); } catch (BeansException ex) { //从单例缓存中删除bean实例 //因为单例模式下为了解决循环依赖,可能它曾经存在了,所以将其销毁 destroySingleton(beanName); throw ex; }});
咱们进入 createBean 办法中持续查看。
筹备创立 bean
protected Object createBean(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args) throws BeanCreationException { if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'"); } RootBeanDefinition mbdToUse = mbd; // Make sure bean class is actually resolved at this point, and // clone the bean definition in case of a dynamically resolved Class // which cannot be stored in the shared merged bean definition. // 锁定class,依据设置的class属性或者依据className来解析Class Class<?> resolvedClass = resolveBeanClass(mbd, beanName); if (resolvedClass != null && !mbd.hasBeanClass() && mbd.getBeanClassName() != null) { mbdToUse = new RootBeanDefinition(mbd); mbdToUse.setBeanClass(resolvedClass); } // Prepare method overrides. //验证及筹备笼罩的办法 try { mbdToUse.prepareMethodOverrides(); } catch (BeanDefinitionValidationException ex) { throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Validation of method overrides failed", ex); } try { // Give BeanPostProcessors a chance to return a proxy instead of the target bean instance. //给BeanPostProcessors一个机会来返回代理用于代替真正的实例 Object bean = resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse); if (bean != null) { return bean; } } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanCreationException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "BeanPostProcessor before instantiation of bean failed", ex); } try { //代码(1) Object beanInstance = doCreateBean(beanName, mbdToUse, args); if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) { logger.trace("Finished creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'"); } return beanInstance; } catch (BeanCreationException | ImplicitlyAppearedSingletonException ex) { // A previously detected exception with proper bean creation context already, // or illegal singleton state to be communicated up to DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry. throw ex; } catch (Throwable ex) { throw new BeanCreationException( mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Unexpected exception during bean creation", ex); }}
- 依据设置的 class 属性或者依据 className 来解析 Class
- 对 override 属性进行标记及验证
咱们晓得在 Spring 的配置中并没有相似于 override-methdo 之类的配置,那么该办法的作用是什么?
咱们之前说过 Spring 配置中存在 lookup-method 和 replace-method 的,这两个配置的加载就是将配置对立寄存在 BeanDefinition 中的 methodOverrides 属性中,而这个函数其实也就是针对这两个配置的。
- 利用初始化前的后处理器,解析指定 bean 是否存在初始化前的短路操作
- 创立 bean
咱们先看一下 override 属性标记及验证的逻辑实现
解决 override 属性
进入 prepareMethodOverrides 办法:
public void prepareMethodOverrides() throws BeanDefinitionValidationException { // Check that lookup methods exist and determine their overloaded status. if (hasMethodOverrides()) { getMethodOverrides().getOverrides().forEach(this::prepareMethodOverride); }}
protected void prepareMethodOverride(MethodOverride mo) throws BeanDefinitionValidationException { // 获取对应类中对应办法名的个数 int count = ClassUtils.getMethodCountForName(getBeanClass(), mo.getMethodName()); if (count == 0) { throw new BeanDefinitionValidationException( "Invalid method override: no method with name '" + mo.getMethodName() + "' on class [" + getBeanClassName() + "]"); } else if (count == 1) { // Mark override as not overloaded, to avoid the overhead of arg type checking. // 标记MethodOverride暂未被笼罩,防止参数类型查看的开销 mo.setOverloaded(false); }}
方才说到 lookup-method 和 replace-method 两个配置性能是对立寄存在 BeanDefinition 中的 methodOverrides 属性中,这两个性能实现原理就是在 bean 实例化的时候如果检测到存在 methodOverrides 属性,就会动静地为以后 bean 生成代理并应用对应的拦截器对 bean 做加强解决。
须要提到的是,对于办法的匹配来说,如果一个类中有多个重载办法则须要依据参数类型进行匹配。如果类中只有办法只有一个那么就设置该办法没有被重载,这样在后续时候能够间接应用找到的办法,不须要进行办法的参数匹配验证,而且还能够提前对办法存在性进行验证,所谓一举两得。
实例化的前置解决
在调用 doCreateBean 之前,还应用了 resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse)办法对 BeanDefinition 中的属性做些前置解决。
Object bean = resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse);if (bean != null) { return bean;}
该段代码的重点就是这个 if 条件,当处理结果不为 null 的时候就会跳过后续 bean 的创立间接返回后果。咱们熟知的 AOP 性能就是基于这里判断的。
protected Object resolveBeforeInstantiation(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd) { Object bean = null; //如果还没被解析过,则解析 if (!Boolean.FALSE.equals(mbd.beforeInstantiationResolved)) { // Make sure bean class is actually resolved at this point. if (!mbd.isSynthetic() && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) { Class<?> targetType = determineTargetType(beanName, mbd); if (targetType != null) { //代码(1) bean = applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation(targetType, beanName); if (bean != null) { //代码(2) bean = applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(bean, beanName); } } } mbd.beforeInstantiationResolved = (bean != null); } return bean;}
该办法中的重点就是这两个办法:applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation、applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization。这两个办法实现都很简略,就是对后处理器中所有的 InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor 类型的后处理器进行 postProcessBeforeInstantiation 办法和 BeanPostProcessor 的 postProcessAfterInitialization 办法的调用。
1. 实例化前的后处理器利用
bean 的实例化前调用,也就是将 AbstractBeanDefinition 转换为 BeanWrapper 前的解决。给子类一个批改 BeanDefinition 的机会,也就是调用这个办法后 bean 就有可能产生变动,有可能是通过解决的代理 bean,也可能是 cglib 生成的。后续会具体介绍,当初只须要明确在 bean 实例化前会调用后处理器的办法进行解决。
protected Object applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation(Class<?> beanClass, String beanName) { for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) { if (bp instanceof InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) { InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp; Object result = ibp.postProcessBeforeInstantiation(beanClass, beanName); if (result != null) { return result; } } } return null;}
2. 实例化后的后处理器利用
Spring 的规定是在 bean 初始化后尽可能保障将注册的后处理器 postProcessAfterInitialization 办法利用到 bean 中,如果返回的 bean 不为空,则不须要再经验 bean 的创立过程。
public Object applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(Object existingBean, String beanName) throws BeansException { Object result = existingBean; for (BeanPostProcessor processor : getBeanPostProcessors()) { Object current = processor.postProcessAfterInitialization(result, beanName); if (current == null) { return result; } result = current; } return result;}