bean 的加载(二)
之前文章次要对 getBean 办法进行简略的介绍,和 FactoryBean 的作用,以及是如何从缓存中获取 bean。本文持续解说 bean 的加载流程。
从 bean 的实例中获取对象
在 getBean 办法里,getObjectForBeanInstance()
是个罕用的办法,无论是从缓存中获取 bean 还是依据不同 scope 策略来加载 bean。总而言之,咱们在获取到 bean 实例后第一步就是调用这个办法来检测正确性,其实就是检测以后 bean 是否为 FactoryBean 类型的 bean,如果是则调用 FactoryBean 实例的 getObject()作为返回值。
须要留神的是无论是缓存中获取到的 bean 还是通过 scope 策略加载的 bean 都是原始的 bean 状态,咱们须要的是工厂 bean 中定义 factory-method 办法中返回的 bean,而 getObjectForBeanInstance 办法就是实现这个工作的。
protected Object getObjectForBeanInstance(
Object beanInstance, String name, String beanName, @Nullable RootBeanDefinition mbd) {
//如果指定的name是工厂相干以"&"为前缀,并且beanInstance又不是FactoryBean则校验不通过
if (BeanFactoryUtils.isFactoryDereference(name)) {
if (beanInstance instanceof NullBean) {
return beanInstance;
}
if (!(beanInstance instanceof FactoryBean)) {
throw new BeanIsNotAFactoryException(beanName, beanInstance.getClass());
}
if (mbd != null) {
mbd.isFactoryBean = true;
}
return beanInstance;
}
//当初咱们有了这个bean实例,这个实例可能是FactoryBean,也可能是失常的bean
//如果是FactoryBean的话,咱们应用它创立实例,但如果是用户想要间接获取工厂实例而不是工厂的getObject办法则须要在BeanName前加上"&"
if (!(beanInstance instanceof FactoryBean)) {
return beanInstance;
}
//加载FactoryBean
Object object = null;
if (mbd != null) {
mbd.isFactoryBean = true;
}
else {
//尝试从缓存中加载bean
object = getCachedObjectForFactoryBean(beanName);
}
if (object == null) {
// 执行到这里表明beanInstance肯定是一个FactoryBean
FactoryBean<?> factory = (FactoryBean<?>) beanInstance;
// containsBeanDefinition检测BeanDefinitionMap中也就是在所有一键加载的类中检测是否定义beanName
if (mbd == null && containsBeanDefinition(beanName)) {
//将GenericBeanDefinition转换为RootBeanDefinition,如果指定BeanName是子bean的话同时会合并父类的属性
mbd = getMergedLocalBeanDefinition(beanName);
}
//是否是用户定义的而不是应用程序自身定义的
boolean synthetic = (mbd != null && mbd.isSynthetic());
object = getObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName, !synthetic);
}
return object;
}
咱们先看一下 getObjectForBeanInstance 次要做了什么:
- 对 FactoryBean 正确性进行验证
- 对非 FactoryBean 不作任何解决
- 对 bean 进行转换
- 将从 Factory 中解析 bean 的工作委托给了
getObjectFromFactoryBean
。
该段代码大多都是辅助代码,真正的外围代码委托给了getObjectFromFactoryBean
。
protected Object getObjectFromFactoryBean(FactoryBean<?> factory, String beanName, boolean shouldPostProcess) {
if (factory.isSingleton() && containsSingleton(beanName)) {
synchronized (getSingletonMutex()) {
Object object = this.factoryBeanObjectCache.get(beanName);
if (object == null) {
//重点办法 doGetObjectFromFactoryBean
object = doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName);
//...省略
}
else {
//重点办法 doGetObjectFromFactoryBean
Object object = doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(factory, beanName);
if (shouldPostProcess) {
try {
object = postProcessObjectFromFactoryBean(object, beanName);
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new BeanCreationException(beanName, "Post-processing of FactoryBean's object failed", ex);
}
}
return object;
}
}
这段代码就是返回的 bean 如果是单例的则须要保障全局惟一,也正因为是单例的所以不用反复创立,能够用缓存来进步性能。
咱们进入doGetObjectFromFactoryBean
办法中。
private Object doGetObjectFromFactoryBean(final FactoryBean<?> factory, final String beanName)
throws BeanCreationException {
Object object;
try {
//是否须要权限校验
if (System.getSecurityManager() != null) {
AccessControlContext acc = getAccessControlContext();
try {
object = AccessController.doPrivileged((PrivilegedExceptionAction<Object>) factory::getObject, acc);
}
catch (PrivilegedActionException pae) {
throw pae.getException();
}
}
else {
//间接调用getObject办法(重点)
object = factory.getObject();
}
}
catch (FactoryBeanNotInitializedException ex) {
throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName, ex.toString());
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new BeanCreationException(beanName, "FactoryBean threw exception on object creation", ex);
}
// Do not accept a null value for a FactoryBean that's not fully
// initialized yet: Many FactoryBeans just return null then.
if (object == null) {
if (isSingletonCurrentlyInCreation(beanName)) {
throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(
beanName, "FactoryBean which is currently in creation returned null from getObject");
}
object = new NullBean();
}
return object;
}
在该办法中,咱们终于看到了想要看到的代码,也就是object = factory.getObject()
。之前咱们曾经讲过了 FactoryBean 的调用办法,如果 bean 是 FactoryBean 类型,则当提取 bean 时提取的并不是 factoryBean 而是 factoryBean 的 getObject 办法的返回值。
获取单例
之前咱们说过如果缓存中不存在曾经加载的 bean 则须要重头开始 bean 的加载,在 Spring 中应用 getSingleton 的重载办法实现了 bean 的加载过程。
getBean 办法:
// 实例化依赖的bean后就能够实例化mbd自身了
// 如果BeanDefinition为单例
if (mbd.isSingleton()) {
//创立Bean实例对象,并且注册给所依赖的对象
sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> {
try {
return createBean(beanName, mbd, args);
}
catch (BeansException ex) {
//从单例缓存中删除bean实例
//因为单例模式下为了解决循环依赖,可能它曾经存在了,所以将其销毁
destroySingleton(beanName);
throw ex;
}
});
//如果是一般bean,间接返回,如果是FactoryBean,则返回它的getObject
bean = getObjectForBeanInstance(sharedInstance, name, beanName, mbd);
}
进入 getSingleton 办法:
public Object getSingleton(String beanName, ObjectFactory<?> singletonFactory) {
Assert.notNull(beanName, "Bean name must not be null");
//加锁
synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
//首先查看对应的bean是否曾经加载过,
Object singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
//如果为空则须要进行singleton的bean初始化
if (singletonObject == null) {
if (this.singletonsCurrentlyInDestruction) {
throw new BeanCreationNotAllowedException(beanName,
"Singleton bean creation not allowed while singletons of this factory are in destruction " +
"(Do not request a bean from a BeanFactory in a destroy method implementation!)");
}
if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
logger.debug("Creating shared instance of singleton bean '" + beanName + "'");
}
//代码(1)
beforeSingletonCreation(beanName);
boolean newSingleton = false;
boolean recordSuppressedExceptions = (this.suppressedExceptions == null);
if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
this.suppressedExceptions = new LinkedHashSet<>();
}
try {
// 通过回调形式获取bean实例。
singletonObject = singletonFactory.getObject();
newSingleton = true;
}
catch (IllegalStateException ex) {
// Has the singleton object implicitly appeared in the meantime ->
// if yes, proceed with it since the exception indicates that state.
singletonObject = this.singletonObjects.get(beanName);
if (singletonObject == null) {
throw ex;
}
}
catch (BeanCreationException ex) {
if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
for (Exception suppressedException : this.suppressedExceptions) {
ex.addRelatedCause(suppressedException);
}
}
throw ex;
}
finally {
if (recordSuppressedExceptions) {
this.suppressedExceptions = null;
}
//代码(2)
afterSingletonCreation(beanName);
}
if (newSingleton) {
//退出缓存 代码(3)
addSingleton(beanName, singletonObject);
}
}
return singletonObject;
}
}
上述代码应用了回调办法,在单例创立的前后做了些筹备及解决操作,而真正获取单例 bean 的办法是在 ObjectFactory 类型的实例 singletonFactory 中。咱们先看一下 getSingleton 办法次要做了什么:
- 查看缓存是否曾经加载过
- 若没有加载,则记录 beanName 为正在加载状态
- 加载单例前记录加载状态,代码(1)
protected void beforeSingletonCreation(String beanName) {
if (!this.inCreationCheckExclusions.contains(beanName) && !this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.add(beanName)) {
throw new BeanCurrentlyInCreationException(beanName);
}
}
这个办法次要做的就是记录加载状态,this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.add(beanName)
将以后正要创立的 bean 记录在缓存中,这样就能够对循环依赖进行检测。
- 获取 bean 实例
- 调用加载单例后的解决办法,代码(2)
protected void afterSingletonCreation(String beanName) {
if (!this.inCreationCheckExclusions.contains(beanName) && !this.singletonsCurrentlyInCreation.remove(beanName)) {
throw new IllegalStateException("Singleton '" + beanName + "' isn't currently in creation");
}
}
和上述相似,只是这里是从缓存中移除 bean 的正在加载状态。
- 将 bean 退出缓存,并删除加载 bean 过程中所记录的各种辅助状态。
protected void addSingleton(String beanName, Object singletonObject) {
synchronized (this.singletonObjects) {
this.singletonObjects.put(beanName, singletonObject);
this.singletonFactories.remove(beanName);
this.earlySingletonObjects.remove(beanName);
this.registeredSingletons.add(beanName);
}
}
- 返回处理结果
当初咱们曾经理解了 bean 的逻辑架构,然而 bean 的加载逻辑是在传入 ObjectFactory 类型的参数 singletonFactory 中定义的。
//创立Bean实例对象,并且注册给所依赖的对象
sharedInstance = getSingleton(beanName, () -> {
try {
return createBean(beanName, mbd, args);
}
catch (BeansException ex) {
//从单例缓存中删除bean实例
//因为单例模式下为了解决循环依赖,可能它曾经存在了,所以将其销毁
destroySingleton(beanName);
throw ex;
}
});
咱们进入 createBean 办法中持续查看。
筹备创立 bean
protected Object createBean(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd, @Nullable Object[] args)
throws BeanCreationException {
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'");
}
RootBeanDefinition mbdToUse = mbd;
// Make sure bean class is actually resolved at this point, and
// clone the bean definition in case of a dynamically resolved Class
// which cannot be stored in the shared merged bean definition.
// 锁定class,依据设置的class属性或者依据className来解析Class
Class<?> resolvedClass = resolveBeanClass(mbd, beanName);
if (resolvedClass != null && !mbd.hasBeanClass() && mbd.getBeanClassName() != null) {
mbdToUse = new RootBeanDefinition(mbd);
mbdToUse.setBeanClass(resolvedClass);
}
// Prepare method overrides.
//验证及筹备笼罩的办法
try {
mbdToUse.prepareMethodOverrides();
}
catch (BeanDefinitionValidationException ex) {
throw new BeanDefinitionStoreException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(),
beanName, "Validation of method overrides failed", ex);
}
try {
// Give BeanPostProcessors a chance to return a proxy instead of the target bean instance.
//给BeanPostProcessors一个机会来返回代理用于代替真正的实例
Object bean = resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse);
if (bean != null) {
return bean;
}
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new BeanCreationException(mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName,
"BeanPostProcessor before instantiation of bean failed", ex);
}
try {
//代码(1)
Object beanInstance = doCreateBean(beanName, mbdToUse, args);
if (logger.isTraceEnabled()) {
logger.trace("Finished creating instance of bean '" + beanName + "'");
}
return beanInstance;
}
catch (BeanCreationException | ImplicitlyAppearedSingletonException ex) {
// A previously detected exception with proper bean creation context already,
// or illegal singleton state to be communicated up to DefaultSingletonBeanRegistry.
throw ex;
}
catch (Throwable ex) {
throw new BeanCreationException(
mbdToUse.getResourceDescription(), beanName, "Unexpected exception during bean creation", ex);
}
}
- 依据设置的 class 属性或者依据 className 来解析 Class
- 对 override 属性进行标记及验证
咱们晓得在 Spring 的配置中并没有相似于 override-methdo 之类的配置,那么该办法的作用是什么?
咱们之前说过 Spring 配置中存在 lookup-method 和 replace-method 的,这两个配置的加载就是将配置对立寄存在 BeanDefinition 中的 methodOverrides 属性中,而这个函数其实也就是针对这两个配置的。
- 利用初始化前的后处理器,解析指定 bean 是否存在初始化前的短路操作
- 创立 bean
咱们先看一下 override 属性标记及验证的逻辑实现
解决 override 属性
进入 prepareMethodOverrides 办法:
public void prepareMethodOverrides() throws BeanDefinitionValidationException {
// Check that lookup methods exist and determine their overloaded status.
if (hasMethodOverrides()) {
getMethodOverrides().getOverrides().forEach(this::prepareMethodOverride);
}
}
protected void prepareMethodOverride(MethodOverride mo) throws BeanDefinitionValidationException {
// 获取对应类中对应办法名的个数
int count = ClassUtils.getMethodCountForName(getBeanClass(), mo.getMethodName());
if (count == 0) {
throw new BeanDefinitionValidationException(
"Invalid method override: no method with name '" + mo.getMethodName() +
"' on class [" + getBeanClassName() + "]");
}
else if (count == 1) {
// Mark override as not overloaded, to avoid the overhead of arg type checking.
// 标记MethodOverride暂未被笼罩,防止参数类型查看的开销
mo.setOverloaded(false);
}
}
方才说到 lookup-method 和 replace-method 两个配置性能是对立寄存在 BeanDefinition 中的 methodOverrides 属性中,这两个性能实现原理就是在 bean 实例化的时候如果检测到存在 methodOverrides 属性,就会动静地为以后 bean 生成代理并应用对应的拦截器对 bean 做加强解决。
须要提到的是,对于办法的匹配来说,如果一个类中有多个重载办法则须要依据参数类型进行匹配。如果类中只有办法只有一个那么就设置该办法没有被重载,这样在后续时候能够间接应用找到的办法,不须要进行办法的参数匹配验证,而且还能够提前对办法存在性进行验证,所谓一举两得。
实例化的前置解决
在调用 doCreateBean 之前,还应用了 resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse)办法对 BeanDefinition 中的属性做些前置解决。
Object bean = resolveBeforeInstantiation(beanName, mbdToUse);
if (bean != null) {
return bean;
}
该段代码的重点就是这个 if 条件,当处理结果不为 null 的时候就会跳过后续 bean 的创立间接返回后果。咱们熟知的 AOP 性能就是基于这里判断的。
protected Object resolveBeforeInstantiation(String beanName, RootBeanDefinition mbd) {
Object bean = null;
//如果还没被解析过,则解析
if (!Boolean.FALSE.equals(mbd.beforeInstantiationResolved)) {
// Make sure bean class is actually resolved at this point.
if (!mbd.isSynthetic() && hasInstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessors()) {
Class<?> targetType = determineTargetType(beanName, mbd);
if (targetType != null) {
//代码(1)
bean = applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation(targetType, beanName);
if (bean != null) {
//代码(2)
bean = applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(bean, beanName);
}
}
}
mbd.beforeInstantiationResolved = (bean != null);
}
return bean;
}
该办法中的重点就是这两个办法:applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation、applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization。这两个办法实现都很简略,就是对后处理器中所有的 InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor 类型的后处理器进行 postProcessBeforeInstantiation 办法和 BeanPostProcessor 的 postProcessAfterInitialization 办法的调用。
1. 实例化前的后处理器利用
bean 的实例化前调用,也就是将 AbstractBeanDefinition 转换为 BeanWrapper 前的解决。给子类一个批改 BeanDefinition 的机会,也就是调用这个办法后 bean 就有可能产生变动,有可能是通过解决的代理 bean,也可能是 cglib 生成的。后续会具体介绍,当初只须要明确在 bean 实例化前会调用后处理器的办法进行解决。
protected Object applyBeanPostProcessorsBeforeInstantiation(Class<?> beanClass, String beanName) {
for (BeanPostProcessor bp : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
if (bp instanceof InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) {
InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor ibp = (InstantiationAwareBeanPostProcessor) bp;
Object result = ibp.postProcessBeforeInstantiation(beanClass, beanName);
if (result != null) {
return result;
}
}
}
return null;
}
2. 实例化后的后处理器利用
Spring 的规定是在 bean 初始化后尽可能保障将注册的后处理器 postProcessAfterInitialization 办法利用到 bean 中,如果返回的 bean 不为空,则不须要再经验 bean 的创立过程。
public Object applyBeanPostProcessorsAfterInitialization(Object existingBean, String beanName)
throws BeansException {
Object result = existingBean;
for (BeanPostProcessor processor : getBeanPostProcessors()) {
Object current = processor.postProcessAfterInitialization(result, beanName);
if (current == null) {
return result;
}
result = current;
}
return result;
}
发表回复